http://jezebel.com/5165522/have-you-seen-nina-riccis-stupefying-shoes
More on those shoes (sorry for Jezebel link, I have a complicated relationship with that blog too) including pics of models wearing them. Apparently none of them fell. Personally, I find these completely nasty - the vestigial heel could be witty in a completely different context, maybe (like, if KY WERE wearing them, or someone else who is doing a super-uber exaggerated femininity on purpose, without calling too much specific attention to the shoes, and there were some other point to the performance...) - they'd have to be deceptively subtle, in other words, which maybe they were in the context of the actual fashion show. Perhaps that's it, actually; maybe it would've worked better for me if the shoes hadn't been the first thing all the blog coverage mentioned. Then again, the clothes in the show don't really blow my mind, so what else were people going to react to?
Something in me resents these models having to risk their necks for someone else's art project, too. Though, again, since nobody fell, maybe they were just amazingly well-engineered (the shoes, I mean) and that point is moot. Still, I feel that way about models in general - they are just used as living canvases; the only way they can express themselves is by walking and, if they're unlucky, responding well to a fall or mishap. How is that fulfilling?
I know it's not really fair to trot out the "how is that fulfulling" argument. Who knows what fulfills people?
I think goth/S&M never really goes away. XD It may be used and discarded at the moment, but I bet the subcultures are as strong as ever. (I have always been really attracted to goth and am enjoying wearing the style cheaply sometimes, now that the clothes from when it was in vogue are in thrift stores. Wasn't that a weird time? Seriously, walking through the mall and seeing puffy black blouses and dangling white things at Bebe and Express. A combination of heaven and hell.)