"Well, the songs are written from the perspective of someone who's had an abortion, and feels relief and a sense of power at ending a biological process which she sees as a use of resources she can't give. We don't know if it's autobiographical. Etc etc."
That would be the pedantic answer, and it's as helpful as tits on a lamppost. In practice, I've never liked the whole "separate the art from the artist" way of being a fan. The songs are intense and sound true. I'm under the impression (based on her personal style and a bit of biographical knowledge) that Kristeen doesn't write a lot of out-and-out fiction. Though she does write in praise of lying, so I guess there's that.
But even so, I think that there's a razor-fine but always-present distinction between seeing a work of art as the story of a personality which you must try to understand, and seeing it as a biography you must try to flesh out. And the former is the way I think fans should try to go. Am I making sense? We can speculate and assume all we want, but to me there's a line between saying "Kristeen wrote some songs with abortions in 'em; they seem autobiographical" and asking "was Kristeen ever pregnant and did she terminate the pregnancy?" We all listen to "Incubator" and go "that's great, that's painful, that sounds like it comes from life" and we're generally pretty sure who was sickened by her crude emotion, and that's part of our enjoyment, but would trying to find out be kind to her (or even that fun or interesting for us)?
So in answer to your primary question: that's how I read it, yeah. In answer to the implied question about whether it's appropriate/offensive, I think she'd be the only one with the right to make that call, and it's really complicated by the fact that the question involves a woman's body - questions about what women fuck, and what the results are, always come a little bit loaded. I think it's within the pale, though. It's just that I don't think an answer would help.
Anonymous: hi! That's quite a thing to say.