I know. I guess it's an inevitable result of a system where about seven women are allowed to be nationally known at all times, and they generally disappear into obscurity at thirty - so all people can do is compare any female performer to one of those same seven women, which inevitably becomes an extremely broad comparison. Female performers and male aren't usually thought of as belonging to the same genre, except for a few very officially recognized tokens, so "female" gets treated as a genre...
...not that the idea of genre isn't nonsense as well, but it's better for describing musicians if you have to, because it doesn't pre-dispose the listener and invite the "yes, they are alike"/"no, this is my favorite musician and they're not at ALL alike!" discussion.
Do I say that a lot, or just think it a lot? I fear the answer.
Anyway, this person's references were pretty complimentary (and even bucked my neat little explanation with a cross-gender comparison, albeit one to an obviously associated act) so I know I'm going for the throat unnecessarily, but you know, I just heard something I've heard a lot in relation to all the female-fronted acts I like.
